Short answer

What the evidence supports

In the September 9, 2026 snapshot, 40 of 1,957 listings have a recorded QC-photo count. Perfume leads by supported listings (11), while the individual listing with the largest recorded set carries 10 photos. Category rank is a coverage signal—not a quality score.

The current category leaders

The six leading categories by number of QC-linked listings are Perfume (11 listings / 26 photos), Audio (4 listings / 9 photos), Bags & Backpacks (4 listings / 6 photos), Other Accessories (3 listings / 9 photos), Wearables (3 listings / 6 photos), Belts (2 listings / 10 photos). These counts are generated from the current local catalogue rather than copied from a seller description.

Two numbers matter. “QC listings” counts how many records in a category have at least one photo signal. “Photos” adds the recorded counts across those records. A category can therefore rank highly because evidence is spread across several items, while one product in another category may have a deeper photo set.

  • Perfume: 11 QC-linked listings and 26 recorded photos.
  • Audio: 4 QC-linked listings and 9 recorded photos.
  • Bags & Backpacks: 4 QC-linked listings and 6 recorded photos.
  • Other Accessories: 3 QC-linked listings and 9 recorded photos.
  • Wearables: 3 QC-linked listings and 6 recorded photos.
  • Belts: 2 QC-linked listings and 10 recorded photos.

More photos do not automatically mean better evidence

A ten-photo set can still miss the one detail needed for a decision. Conversely, two well-framed photos may answer a narrow question. Count is best used as a discovery filter: it tells you where inspection material exists, then you judge framing, resolution, variant match and relevance.

For footwear, useful coverage often includes both shoes, heel alignment, outsole, size label and an insole measurement. For bags, dimensions, hardware, strap attachments, lining and corners may matter more. Use the category-specific sequence in the QC photo guide.

Why coverage is only a small share of the directory

QC-linked records currently represent 2% of the browsable snapshot. That limited coverage is useful information in itself. It prevents the directory from implying that inspection evidence exists for every item and makes it easier to identify where an extra measurement or photo may be necessary.

A missing QC badge does not prove the item is poor. It means this snapshot does not record that evidence. The correct next step is to inspect the current listing and determine what the warehouse can provide for the exact order.

Use category data without turning it into a ranking claim

The category table answers “where does the current directory have more recorded evidence?” It does not answer “which category has the best products?” Product quality, seller reliability and route eligibility require different inputs.

Open the QC finder to see the supported records, then move back to the relevant category when you need broader comparison. We will refresh this article only when the underlying catalogue snapshot materially changes.

Sources & scope

What this report used

Sources are provided for context and independent checking. Community statements remain self-reported unless the article says otherwise.